AMALG. TRANSIT UNION, DIV. 1384 v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC.

No. 75-2776.

529 F.2d 1073 (1976)

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, DIVISION 1384 and the Amalgamated Council of Greyhound Divisions, AFL-CIO, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., a corporation, Defendant and Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 30, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Heilbron (argued), of McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant and appellant.

Peter D. Nussbaum (argued), of Brundage, Neyhart, Beeson & Tayer, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs and appellees.

Before HUFSTEDLER, KILKENNY and SNEED, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Greyhound Lines, Inc. (Greyhound) appeals the issuance of a preliminary injunction under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185, on behalf of the Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 1384, AFL-CIO, and the Amalgamated Council of Greyhound Divisions, AFL-CIO (Union). We affirm.

Greyhound notified the Union on April 17, 1975 that effective June 25, 1975 it planned to change...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases