1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 540 S.W.2d
  5. 540 S.W.2d 876 (1976)
 

CHAMBERLIN v. MISSOURI ELECTIONS COM'N

No. 59505.

540 S.W.2d 876 (1976)

Howard CHAMBERLIN and William Bryan Miller, Respondents, v. MISSOURI ELECTIONS COMMISSION, a Governmental Agency, et al., Appellants, and John C. Danforth, Intervenor-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

June 21, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard F. Sachs, Kansas City, for appellants.

Arthur A. Benson II, Kansas City, for respondents.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Andrew Rothschild, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for intervenor.

HENLEY, Judge.

This is an action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. It presents questions involving the constitutionality of parts1 of the Missouri Campaign Finance and Disclosure Law (hereinafter the Campaign Law) enacted by the initiative in 1974 effective January 1, 1975.2

Howard Chamberlin and William Bryan Miller (hereinafter plaintiffs or Mr. Chamberlin, Mr. Miller),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases