ABRAHAM v. ABRAHAM


556 P.2d 718 (1976)

27 Or.App. 587

Melvin H. ABRAHAM, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. Joan M. ABRAHAM, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 29, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Malcolm J. Corrigall, Albany, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Daniels & Corrigall, Albany.

Frederick L. Decker, Albany, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Richard T. Kropp and Emmons, Kyle, Kropp & Kryger, Albany.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LEE and TANZER, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order modifying a previous support order by raising the required support payments for the benefit of the former wife from $100 per month to $150 per month. She appeals contending the increase is insufficient. The former husband cross-appeals contending there has been no substantial change of circumstance and that therefore no increase is warranted.

Suffice it to say that we agree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases