1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 540 S.W.2d
  5. 540 S.W.2d 590 (1976)
 

ROLAND v. STATE

No. CR76-57.

540 S.W.2d 590 (1976)

James ROLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

September 20, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bill W. Bristow, Jonesboro, for appellant.

Jim Guy Tucker, Atty. Gen. by B. J. McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.

BYRD, Justice.

The issue in this case in not what laws, appellant James Roland, may have violated, but whether he was entitled to a directed verdict, upon a charge of an accessory after the fact to the delivery of a controlled substance by one John White. Ark.Stat.Ann. § 41-120 (Repl.1964), defines an accessory after the fact as follows:

"An accessory after the fact is a person who, after a full knowledge that a crime has been committed, conceals it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases