OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Respondents sought and recovered damages which resulted from appellant's breach of a commitment to loan money to finance the construction of respondents' home. Appellant contends this was error. We disagree.
The district court's finding of detrimental reliance is supported by substantial evidence, and, thus, we will not disturb it on appeal. Alves v. Bumguardner, 91 Nev. 799,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.