Bernard KABACK and Florence Kaback, Plaintiffs,
v.
SCHWEICKART & CO. et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, S. D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 27, 1976.
May 27, 1976.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, for plaintiffs; Neil Schwarzfeld, Joel Harris, New York City, of counsel.
Lunney & Crocco, New York City, for defendants Schweickart & Co., Winfield H. Schweickart, Golashesky, Bennett, Schwerin, Tomasulo and Reimer; Charles Crocco, New York City, of counsel.
Segal & Hundley, New York City, for defendant Alexander P. Kelly, III; Marvin Segal, Margaret L. Shaw, New York City, of counsel.
Langberg & Ringel, New York City, for defendant Arthur Rafkind; Nathan Ringel, New York City, of counsel.
Freeman, Meade, Wasserman, Sharfman & Schneider, New York City, for defendant Howard M. Miller; J. Owen Zurhellen, New York City, of counsel.
United States District Court, S. D. New York.
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Bernard and Florence Kaback, husband and wife, college educated, both principals in the New York City school system, bring this action against various defendants seeking recovery of the value of securities, essentially upon claims of violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and of Rule 10b...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.