HOAGLUND v. DANIELS


50 A.D.2d 923 (1975)

Harry Hoaglund et al., Appellants, v. Ruth E. Daniels, Appellant-Respondent, and Carella Holding Corp. et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 31, 1975


Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The complaint was properly dismissed.

Even assuming that the letter of May 30, 1973 may be deemed to have revived plaintiffs' option of first refusal, such option agreement is violative of the Statute of Frauds (General Obligations Law, § 5-703) and plaintiffs have not shown such part performance as would allow the courts to exercise their equitable powers. The cross complaint was not subject to automatic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases