Judgment affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The allegations of petitioner that the award of the contract to respondent H. O. Penn Machinery Co., Inc., was unlawful and in violation of section 103 of the General Municipal Law are unsupported by factual allegations which would overcome the presumption that the respondent county purchasing agent acted properly. Thus, Special Term...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
