Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs.
Petitioner contends that the Tidal Wetlands Act (Environmental Conservation Law, § 25-0101 et seq.) is unconstitutional as applied in that the Act deprives petitioner of its property without just compensation. It also contends that respondent failed to give due consideration to the reasonable economic and social development of the State in making his determination. These contentions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.