Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs.
There is no evidence that the determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board was arbitrary, capricious or characterized by an abuse of discretion (Executive Law, § 297-a, subd 7, par e). In our opinion the record on this proceeding demonstrates that the complaint lacked merit as a matter of law (see State Div. of Human Rights v Buffalo Auto Glass Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.