Order affirmed, without costs.
While Special Term correctly held that there are questions of fact with respect to the merits of this action, but that the third and fourth causes of action and parts of the first and second causes of action are barred by the applicable Statutes of Limitations, we find that there is also a question of fact as to whether the acts of defendant Kurtz, as early as 1962 and 1963, constituted a repudiation of the partnership, thereby resulting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
