Order affirmed, without costs.
The reductions in assessed valuation ordered by Special Term are amply supported by the record on this appeal. We do, however, disagree with Special Term's statement, in its opinion, that appellant admitted that its assessments were made at various percentages greater than 100%. Petitioner served appellant with demands to admit the ratios, constituting the State equalization rates, for the years in suit and appellant did not specifically...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
