In this action in eminent domain both parties have appealed from a judgment which, inter alia, awarded compensation to the condemnee, a pharmacist, for the value of certain "ethical drugs" located on the condemned real property but refused to award any compensation for loss of business goodwill resulting from the taking. In dealing with the questions thus presented we are required to address a
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. ABRAMS
15 Cal.3d 813 (1975)
543 P.2d 905
126 Cal. Rptr. 473
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ARTHUR J. ABRAMS, Defendant and Appellant.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 29, 1975.
December 29, 1975.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Eugene B. Jacobs, Robert J. Hall, Oliver, Stoever & Laskin, Thomas W. Stoever and C. Edward Dilkes for Plaintiff and Appellant.
John H. Larson, County Counsel, Terry C. Smith, Assistant County Counsel, S. Robert Ambrose, Deputy County Counsel, Martin & Flandrick, Robert Flandrick, Harry S. Fenton, Joseph A. Montoya, Robert L. Meyer and Robert W. Vidor as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
Fadem, Berger & Stocker, Fadem, Kanner, Berger & Stocker, Fadem, Berger & McIntire and Gideon Kanner for Defendant and Appellant.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.