TOWN OF RICHMOND v. MURDOCK

No. 132 (1974).

70 Wis.2d 642 (1975)

235 N. W. 2d 497

TOWN OF RICHMOND, Respondent, v. MURDOCK, d/b/a Kentwood Farm, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 25, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by H. Keith Schoff of Madison.

For the respondent there was a brief by Daniel F. Aschenbrener and Aschenbrener & Koenig, all of Shawano, and oral argument by Daniel F. Aschenbrener.


ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

As at a cornhusking bee, some shucking needs to be done in this case to get down to the major issues presented by this appeal. So we begin by discussing and discarding the general claim of constitutional infirmity in any town in this state providing for conditional use permits as to a commercial operation in an area zoned agricultural.

Free speech. Appellant contends that the prohibition without use permit of his skeet-shooting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases