Claimant's contentions on appeal overlook the fact that claimant himself testified that he violated the employer's sign-out rule knowingly and that he had previously violated the rule and been warned that a subsequent violation might dictate his discharge. Such behavior clearly rises to the level of misconduct contemplated in Matter of James (Levine) (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.