This trial involved a pure issue of fact as to whether the identifiable containers in the defendant-appellant's apartment, attributable to him, were shown by a chain of connective evidence to have been the same which, according to the police chemist, were found to contain heroin. Due to errors in description, such as, for instance, referring to the same container by different appellations, an unsuccessful attempt was made at trial to confuse the jury in following the particular...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
