URBAN RENEWAL AGCY v. CALIF. COASTAL ZONE CONSER. COM.

Docket No. S.F. 23306.

15 Cal.3d 577 (1975)

542 P.2d 645

125 Cal. Rptr. 485

URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL ZONE CONSERVATION COMMISSION et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

November 26, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Carl Boronkay, Assistant Attorney General, Roderick Walston and Richard C. Jacobs, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Appellants.

William C. Marsh, City Attorney, Richard C. Salladin, W. Reece Bader, Steven A. Brick and Orrick, Herrington, Rowley & Sutcliffe for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

RICHARDSON, J.

This case presents questions regarding the availability of "grandfather clause" exemptions for municipal corporations engaging in projects which otherwise would require a permit under the California Coastal Zone Conservation Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 27000 et seq.). We have concluded that municipal corporations may qualify for such an exemption since the act discloses a legislative intent to treat such...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases