We find, as the District Attorney candidly concedes, that the verdict convicting defendant of robbery, grand larceny and possession of a weapon cannot stand. Defendant, on the facts in this case, could not have committed the robbery without also commiting the grand larceny and he could not have taken property from the person of the complainant by means of a weapon without possessing a weapon (actually, here defendant was responsible for the actual physical possession by his...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
