PER CURIAM.
Appellant's sole point on appeal is that the court erred in denying his motion for discharge under Rule 3.191(a)(1), R Cr P.
The motion for discharge, filed February 27, 1974, alleges that appellant was taken into custody on August 7, 1973, on the felony charge for which he stands convicted. These facts, if true, would make a prima facie case for discharge.
However, we must presume that in denying the motion the trial court necessarily...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
