BIG RIVERS ELECTRIC CORP. v. ENVIRONMENTAL PRO. AGCY.

Nos. 74-2015, 74-2020.

523 F.2d 16 (1975)

BIG RIVERS ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, Commonwealth of Kentucky and Peabody Coal Company, Intervenors, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Russell E. Train, Administrator, Respondent. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and Russell E. Train, Administrator, Respondents, Natural Resources Defense Counsel, Inc., Intervenor, Ed W. Hancock, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

September 4, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie Henry, Wilson W. Snyder, Fuller, Henry, Hodge & Snyder, Toledo, Ohio, for petitioners in 74-2015.

Alan G. Kirk, II, Gen. Counsel, E.P. A., Thomas A. Pursley, III, Richard J. Denney, Jr., Charles W. Shipley, Pollution Control Section, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., David D. Beals, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, Ky., Armistead W. Gilliam, Jr., Smith & Schnacke, Dayton, Ohio, Alfred V.J. Prather, J. William Doolittle, Prather, Levenberg, Seeger, Doolittle, Farmer & Ewing, Richard E. Ayres, Washington, D.C., for respondents and intervenors in both cases.

Thomas A. Pedersen, Robert H. Marquis, Gen. Counsel TVA, Beauchamp E. Brogan, Lynn G. Morehous, Knoxville, Tenn., for petitioner in 74-2020.

Before CELEBREZZE, MILLER and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.


LIVELY, Circuit Judge.

The underlying question in this case is whether the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) properly disapproved a state regulation promulgated under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1857a-j (Supp.1975), which would have authorized coal-burning plants ("sources" in the Act) to employ "alternate control strategies" for the control of air pollution by sulfur oxide gases without showing that constant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases