LINSENMEYER v. HANCOCK

No. 1 CA-CIV 2191.

23 Ariz. App. 444 (1975)

533 P.2d 1181

Otto H. LINSENMEYER, Individually and as Alter Ego of Hulda Original Inc., and Hulda Original Sales Corporation, Arizona Corporations, Appellant, v. Hulda R. Sturges HANCOCK, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Rehearing Denied May 27, 1975.

Review Denied July 1, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank E. Dickey, Jr., Phoenix, for appellant.

Murray Miller, Phoenix, for appellee.


OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The basic question which is dispositive of this case on appeal is whether an issue submitted to a jury without objection at the first trial may be objected to at the second trial for damages only. The appellant also questions the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the jury's verdict. Numerous other questions were raised by appellant generally regarding the trial court's discretion; we find no abuse of discretion by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases