1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 324 So.2d
  5. 324 So.2d 121 (1975)
 

TACO BELL OF CALIFORNIA v. ZAPPONE

Nos. 74-765, 75-665.

324 So.2d 121 (1975)

TACO BELL OF CALIFORNIA, a California Corporation Duly Authorized to Transact Business in Florida, Appellant, v. Ralph ZAPPONE, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Rehearing Denied January 20, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Daniel Stephens, Roger W. Sims, and Bruce Stone, Holland & Knight, Tampa, for appellant.

A.J. Barranco, Jr. and Harold Bluestein, of Barranco, Darlson & Daniel, Miami, for appellee.

SCHEB, Judge.

The plaintiff/appellee recovered $108,318.25 as a result of a jury verdict rendered in a suit for misrepresentation by defendant/appellant concerning a restaurant franchise. We reverse.

The operative facts are these: Appellant Taco Bell of California (Taco Bell) is a California corporation which operates retail food outlets in Florida and other states. Appellee Ralph Zappone operated a restaurant in California which was netting him about one...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases