1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 23 Ariz.
  5. 23 Ariz. App. 362 (1975)
 

CITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 1 CA-IC 1039.

23 Ariz. App. 362 (1975)

533 P.2d 573

CITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Robert D. Tendick, Respondent Employee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

Rehearing Denied April 30, 1975.

Review Denied June 3, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones, Teilborg, Sanders, Haga & Parks, P.C. by William R. Jones, Jr., and Robert J. Bruno, Phoenix, for petitioners.

Edward F. Cummerford, Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Langerman, Begam, Lewis, Leonard & Marks by Noel Fidel, Phoenix, for respondent employee.

OPINION

STEVENS, Judge.

The Court must decide whether the finding of The Industrial Commission that the injury sustained was in the course of and arising out of the employment is supported by reasonable evidence and the Workmen's Compensation law.

Robert D. Tendick (employee) was employed by petitioner Crystal Ice & Cold Storage and while performing his duties, was injured on 12 October 1972. He filed a claim for benefits before The Industrial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases