OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J., September 22, 1975:
Appellant contends that the lower court erred when it found the repayment provision in appellant's loan usurious under the version of the Pennsylvania usury law
On November 19, 1958, appellant made a loan to the appellee and her husband for the principal sum of $7000.00 plus 6% interest, and a bond and mortgage were
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.