1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 44 Ohio
  5. 44 Ohio St. 2d 229 (1975)
 

FRANCIS v. CHRYSLER CORP.

No. 75-527.

44 Ohio St. 2d 229 (1975)

FRANCIS, APPELLANT, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 31, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rudd, Karl, Sheerer, Lybarger & Campbell, Co., L. P. A., and Mr. Benjamin B. Sheerer, for appellant.

Messrs. Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and Mr. Walter E. deBruin, for appellee Chrysler Corporation.

Mr. William J. Brown, attorney general, for appellee Administrator, Bureau of Workmen's Compensation.

Per Curiam.

Appellant's primary contention is that the ordinary and plain meaning of R. C. 4123.84,* its legislative history, the special characteristics of self-insurance, and the liberal construction to be given to the Workmen's Compensation Act, include as a "benefit" the furnishing of medical services to an employee by a salaried plant physician, thereby causing such treatment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases