GRIFFITH v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BD. OF REVISION

Nos. 75-582 and 75-583.

44 Ohio St. 2d 225 (1975)

GRIFFITH, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION, APPELLEE. CLEVELAND SHERATON CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 31, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Forrester & Kovanda, Mr. John E. Forrester and Mr. Ralph D. Kovanda, for appellants.

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Timothy J. Armstrong and Mr. Thomas P. Cyrus, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

Stanjim was decided by this court on June 12, 1974, which was after taxpayers filed the complaint forms herein, but prior to dismissal of such complaints by the board of revision. Stanjim, at page 235, decided affirmatively that "full compliance with R. C. 5715.19 and 5715.13 is necessary before a county board of revision is empowered to act on the merits of a claim." Stanjim further recognized the authority of the Board of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases