COLUMBUS BAR ASSN. v. TUTTLE

D. D. No. 74-13.

41 Ohio St. 2d 183 (1975)

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. TUTTLE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 12, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard L. Loveland, Mr. Richard V. Patchen and Mr. Daniel F. Carmack, for relator.

Mr. William W. Johnson and Mr. Charles E. Brown, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

As the Supreme Court of California so cogently stated: "The rule against commingling `was adopted to provide against the probability in some cases, the possibility in many cases, and the danger in all cases that such commingling will result in the loss of clients' money.'" Clark v. State Bar (1952), 39 Cal.2d 161, 168, 246 P.2d 1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases