1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 539 P.2d
  5. 539 P.2d 1132 (1975)
 

LAKESIDE v. PUBLIC WELFARE DIVISION

539 P.2d 1132 (1975)

Lea R. LAKESIDE, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC WELFARE DIVISION of the State of Oregon et al., Respondents. Linda E. BACON, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC WELFARE DIVISION of the State of Oregon et al., Respondents. Nancy D. TUCKER, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC WELFARE DIVISION of the State of Oregon et al., Respondents. Tamara J. GABIN, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC WELFARE DIVISION of the State of Oregon et al., Respondents. Ronda KNIGHT, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC WELFARE DIVISION of the State of Oregon et al., Respondents. Sarah MARCHANT, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC WELFARE DIVISION of the State of Oregon et al., Respondents. Ann M. GAYLORD, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC WELFARE DIVISION of the State of Oregon et al., Respondents. Mary E. TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC WELFARE DIVISION of the State of Oregon et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 10, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Roberts, Legal Aid Service, Multnomah Bar Association, Inc., Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FOLEY and THORNTON, JJ.

SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

Petitioners appeal from orders of a hearing officer of the Public Welfare Division that had the effect of reducing the amount of food stamp benefits they receive. The issues raised involve the validity of the administrative regulations that produced this result and interpretation of some of those regulations. We hold the regulations valid, but agree with petitioners' contentions that they were incorrectly interpreted by the hearing officer.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases