STIRLING v. CHEMICAL BANK

Docket No. 75-7006.

511 F.2d 1030 (1975)

David STIRLING, Jr., and William G. Stirling, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHEMICAL BANK, Individually, and as agent, et al., Defendants-Appellees. David STIRLING, Jr., and William G. Stirling, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNION PLANTERS NATIONAL BANK OF MEMPHIS et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided February 11, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Feldshuh & Frank, New York City (Sidney Feldshuh, Richard M. Kraver, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, for defendants-appellees Chemical Bank, Frank Beattie, John J. Irish and Paavo Prima.

Bleakley, Platt, Schmidt & Fritz, New York City (Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber, Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for defendants-appellees Marine Midland Bank—Western and Marine Midland Bank—Rochester.

Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City (Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant-appellee Lincoln First Bank of Rochester.

Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, for defendants-appellees Chase Manhattan Bank and First National State Bank of New Jersey.

Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates, New York City (Samuel E. Gates, Bernard J. Bonn III, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees Union Commerce Bank and Union Planters Nat. Bank.

Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, and MANSFIELD and OAKES, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

By decision dated September 30, 1974, Judge Dudley B. Bonsal of the Southern District of New York granted motions dismissing with prejudice plaintiffs-appellants' claims against defendants-appellees in several related stockholders' class actions, except that common law fraud claims against defendant Union Commerce Bank were dismissed without prejudice (72 Civ. 4476). In another action (74 Civ. 66) a similar complaint was dismissed with leave to file an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases