1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 398 F.Supp.
  5. 398 F.Supp. 865 (1975)
 

EXXON CORPORATION v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMIN.

Civ. A. Nos. 74-1617, 74-1658 and 74-1705.

398 F.Supp. 865 (1975)

EXXON CORPORATION and Esso Standard Oil S. A., Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants, United States of America and Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Intervenor-Defendants. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION and Mobil Oil Caribe, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants, United States of America et al., Intervenor-Defendants. TEXACO, INC., and Texaco Puerto Rico, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants, United States of America and Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Intervenor-Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 17, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, Andrew J. Kilcarr, Washington, D.C., Allan R. Freedman, Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Levine, New York City, for Mobil Oil & Mobil Oil Caribe, Inc.

Carla A. Hills, Stanley D. Rose, Paul T. Michael (main counsel), Christopher Was, U.S. Dept. of Justice (Economic Stabilization Section), Washington, D. C., Ezra Levine, FEA, Robert E. Montgomery, Gen. Counsel, FEA, Washington, D. C., for FEA and Administrator of FEA and United States.

Yynn R. Coleman, Michael J. Henke, Washington, D.C., for Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

John F. Graybeal, F. Anthony Maio, Benton L. Becker, Arthur Amdur, Washington, D.C., for CORCO.

Michael A. Schlanger, William H. Allen, John A. Hodges, Washington, D.C., for Exxon and Esso Standard Oil.

Jo V. Morgan, and John J. Wilson, Washington, D.C., James M. Tunnell, Jr., and Wm. O. LaMotte, III, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Del., for Texaco and Texaco Puerto Rico.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FLANNERY, District Judge.

The three above-captioned cases are before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Although the cases have not been consolidated, they involve many common questions, have been briefed according to similar schedules, and were argued together on March 17, 1975. This Memorandum Opinion will cover the issues in all three cases, pointing out where necessary those issues that pertain only to certain parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases