In applying for benefits, claimant signed a summary of interview in which he stated that he lived in a rent-free apartment in a building of which his brother was superintendent because he helped his brother with various caretaking activities. At the hearing claimant contended that he did not work in the building and that he lived in his brother's apartment. There was thus created a question of credibility, the resolution of which by the board must be sustained if based on...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.