Defendant's arguments I, II, & IV all relate to the trial judge's review of the evidence in his charge to the jury. Specifically, the defendant contends that the judge erred by "misstating material facts", by "failing in its recapitulation of evidence to mention any of the specific evidentiary points that might lead the jury to conclude that the State had failed to prove defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.