Eyewitness testimony established that defendant argued with Jeffrey Rifenburgh and, during the course of an ensuing struggle, he admittedly struck Rifenburgh over the head with a baseball bat. Defendant offered the defense of justification in explanation of his behavior, but this version of events was obviously rejected by the jury. He now contends that the proof was insufficient to establish one of the elements of the crime of which he stands convicted, namely, that he acted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
