BRITT, Judge.
Defendant contends first that the court erred in allowing Officer Schoch to testify as to what was found in the Chevrolet and allowing said evidence to be admitted. We find no merit in the assignment.
This contention relates primarily to the shotgun and rifle which police removed from the Chevrolet and which were admitted as evidence. We think the evidence was admissible under authority of State v. Hill,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.