The two major grounds of this appeal are (1) an allegedly improper comment by the prosecutor in summation as to certain testimony of a prosecution witness and (2) the allegedly improper charge as to the definition of an interested witness. As to the first claim, defendant points out that during cross-examination Officer Keillor, an undercover agent who was a chief prosecution witness, was unable to give eyewitness testimony as to the transaction involving defendant and one...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
