RIEGLER v. HOLIDAY SKATING RINK, INC.

Docket No. 55224, (Calendar No. 2).

393 Mich. 607 (1975)

227 N.W.2d 759

RIEGLER v. HOLIDAY SKATING RINK, INC.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided April 7, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCroskey, Libner, VanLeuven, Kortering, Cochrane & Brock (by Timothy J. Bott), for plaintiff.

Amicus Curiae: Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Michael A. Lockman, for the Department of Civil Rights.


LEVIN, J.

The question is whether § 146 of the Penal Code,1 before its 1972 amendment, prohibited discrimination in public accommodations based on hair length.

John Riegler was denied admission to the Holiday Skating Rink because his hair, alleged to be "slightly shorter than shoulder length", was too long.

Riegler filed a complaint in the circuit court requesting that Holiday Skating Rink be enjoined from excluding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases