MATTER OF LOCASCIO v. FEUER


45 A.D.2d 937 (1974)

In the Matter of Alfred E. Locascio, Respondent, v. Herbert J. Feuer et al., Constituting The Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Victor B. Tosi et al., Respondents-Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

August 26, 1974


There is insufficient evidence to overcome the rule that a public officer, here the notary public, has performed a duty imposed by law.

Murphy, J., dissents in the following memorandum:

I would affirm. Section 135 of the Election Law establishes the form that a notary public must use as opposed to other subscribing witnesses. None of the 19 witnesses who testified at the hearing presented any evidence of compliance with the statute nor was the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases