Judgment affirmed, without costs.
Though appellants claim that the sign proposed by petitioner is in excess of the dimensions allowable under the zoning ordinance, the proof indicates that the sign is substantially of the same dimensions as an existing sign previously allowed on petitioner's premises. In fact, petitioner's proposed sign is actually smaller than the original sign, with the exception that it may be three feet higher off the ground. The original sign...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
