Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.
No questions of fact were considered. The proof raised questions for the jury as to whether a reasonably prudent person would have permitted the infant plaintiff to place her hand in such a position as to cause her injury, as to whether a reasonably prudent person should have foreseen the consequences of opening the door to the automobile and as to whether the infant plaintiff was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
