CORRADO v. PROVIDENCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

No. 1952-Appeal.

320 A.2d 331 (1974)

Samuel CORRADO et ux. v. PROVIDENCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY et al.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

June 5, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Corrado, pro se, for plaintiffs.

Timothy J. McCarthy, Louis A. Mascia, City Solicitor, for defendants.


OPINION

JOSLIN, Justice.

This is one of several chapters — and hopefully one of the last — in the litigation between Samuel Corrado and his wife Dorothy, as plaintiffs, and the Providence Redevelopment Agency (redevelopment agency) and the treasurer of the city of Providence, as defendants. At the root of the litigation are the Corrados' attempts to prevent the redevelopment agency from taking their property under the eminent domain power....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases