KOEHLER v. DRT SPORTSERVICE, INC.

Docket Nos. 16601, 16881-16883, 18600.

55 Mich. App. 567 (1974)

223 N.W.2d 461

KOEHLER v. DRT SPORTSERVICE, INC. BEALL v. DRT SPORTSERVICE, INC. HOTTON v. DRT SPORTSERVICE, INC. WICHTMAN v. DRT SPORTSERVICE, INC. SIELOFF v. DRT SPORTSERVICE, INC.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided September 24, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kelman, Loria, Downing & Schneider, for plaintiffs.

Plunkett, Cooney, Rutt & Peacock (by Charles T. McGorisk and John P. Jacobs), for defendant DRT Sportservice, Inc.

Finch & Finch, for defendant Dearborn Townehouse, Inc.

Baun & Van Tiem (D. James Barton, of counsel), for defendants John Bidwell and Sol Milan.

Before: J.H. GILLIS, P.J., and ALLEN and ELLIOTT, JJ.


ALLEN, J.

Five separate cases arising out of a single automobile accident are consolidated in this appeal. Each suit was filed against three named tavern establishments under the dramshop act, MCLA 436.22; MSA 18.993, and all were heard by the same trial judge who in each case granted defendant tavern operators' motion for summary judgment.

Succinctly stated, the facts alleged in the respective bills of complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases