1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 64 Wis.2d
  5. 64 Wis.2d 379 (1974)
 

STATE v. TRIMBELL

No. State 221.

64 Wis.2d 379 (1974)

219 N.W.2d 369

STATE, Respondent, v. TRIMBELL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 28, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Howard B. Eisenberg, state public defender, and Richard M. Sals, assistant state public defender, and oral argument by Mr. Sals.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Christine M. Wiseman, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

Three questions are asked by this appeal regarding the two convictions—one for possession of hashish with intent to deliver;1 and the other for possession of opium with intent to deliver.2

I. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain the jury verdict, as to the "knowing possession" of hashish and opium by the defendant?

Was the jury entitled to infer knowing possession...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases