HANLEY, J.
On appeal, the defendants challenge said convictions on the grounds that:
1. The evidence educed was insufficient to support the convictions;
2. The defendants were entitled to immunity from prosecution under secs. 77.61 (12) and 885.25 (2), Stats. 1969;
3. The defendants were denied due process of law;
4. The admission into evidence of prior convictions of defendant Alioto constituted prejudicial error, and
5. The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.