1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 111 Ariz.
  5. 111 Ariz. 279 (1974)
 

NAVAJO TRIBE v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF ADMINISTRATION

No. 11683.

111 Ariz. 279 (1974)

528 P.2d 623

The NAVAJO TRIBE and the City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, Petitioners, City of Tucson, a municipal corporation, Intervenor, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, the Finance Division thereof, Raymond S. Long, in his official capacity as Director, and T.G. Hawkins, in his official capacity as Assistant Director, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

Rehearing Denied January 8, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brown, Vlassis & Bain, P.A. by Ronald E. Lowe, Joe R. Purcell, City Atty., of Phoenix, by Robert A. Slonaker, Phoenix, for petitioners.

James D. Webb, City Atty. of Tucson by Phyllis P. Sugar and Frederick S. Dean, Tucson, for intervenor.

N. Warner Lee, Atty. Gen., by Fred W. Stork, III, Phoenix, for respondents.

HAYS, Chief Justice.

The controversy presented by this special action in the nature of mandamus was engendered by an opinion of the Attorney General of Arizona, Department of Law Opinion No. 74-12. Based on that opinion, the Arizona Department of Administration has refused to accept obligations and make payments that the Arizona Department of Economic Security (DES) contracted for with The Navajo Tribe and the City of Phoenix, petitioners, and the City of Tucson,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases