O'NEILL, C. J.
The propositions of law set forth in appellants' brief propound two theories for the imposition of liability upon appellee. First, it is contended that violation of R. C. 951.02, in itself, should constitute negligence per se; second, it is contended that, on the facts presented, there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding.
Since the court agrees with appellants' second contention that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
