1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 38 Ohio
  5. 38 Ohio St. 2d 233 (1974)
 

STANJIM CO. v. BD. OF REVISION

No. 73-886.

38 Ohio St. 2d 233 (1974)

THE STANJIM CO. ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF REVISION OF MAHONING COUNTY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 12, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Forrester & Kovanda and Mr. Ralph D. Kovanda, for appellants.

Mr. Vincent E. Gilmartin, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Dennis Haines, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

This appeal presents for our determination the question left unanswered by the Court of Appeals in State, ex rel. Wedgewood 129 Corp., v. Olenick, supra. Appellants claim that failure to fully complete BTA Form 1 cannot be the basis for dismissal of their real property assessment complaints, when there are "home-drawn" documents before the county board of revision sufficient to satisfy the requirements of R. C. 5715.19 and 5715.13...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases