PEOPLE v. CONKLIN

Docket No. Crim. 17039.

12 Cal.3d 259 (1974)

522 P.2d 1049

114 Cal. Rptr. 241

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JAMES E. CONKLIN, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

June 12, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Joseph P. Busch, District Attorney, Harry B. Sondheim, Harry Wood and Arnold T. Guminski, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Eagleton & Petterson and James D. Petterson for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

SULLIVAN, J.

Defendant James E. Conklin was charged by information with committing several acts prohibited by Penal Code section 631, subdivision (a).1 He demurred to the information (§ 1004, subd. 4), asserting that section 631 is invalid because it conflicts with, or attempts to regulate the same area covered by title III of the Omnibus Crime Control...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases