1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 41 Cal.App.3d
  5. 41 Cal.App.3d 206 (1974)
 

HINCKLEY v. BECHTEL CORP.

Docket No. 31265.

41 Cal.App.3d 206 (1974)

116 Cal. Rptr. 33

MABEL W. HINCKLEY, Individually and as Administratrix, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BECHTEL CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

August 21, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Melbert B. Adams and Clayton O. Rost for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, Paul R. Haerle, Stephen D. Butler, Hassard, Bonnington, Rogers & Huber, John I. Jefsen and Lawrence Handelman for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

KANE, J.

Plaintiff, Mabel W. Hinckley, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Charles Hinckley ("appellant"), appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after respondents' demurrer to the first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.

The allegations of appellant's first amended complaint, which in ruling on a demurrer must be regarded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases