APPLICATION OF YARDLEY

Patent Appeal No. 9098.

493 F.2d 1389 (1974)

Application of Richard Q. YARDLEY.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 28, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Brinkman, William T. Bullinger, Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D.C., attorneys of record, for appellant; Robert B. Murray, Jr., Washington, D.C., of counsel.

Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents; Jere W. Sears, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges.


LANE, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner's rejections of the claim in appellant's application1 for an ornamental design for a watch. There are two rejections: (1) a rejection based on obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103, and (2) a rejection based on estoppel in view of prior copyright registrations. We reverse.

The Claimed Design

Appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases