1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 304 So.2d
  5. 304 So.2d 895 (1974)
 

WILLIAMS v. ALABAMA NEON SIGN CO.

SC 862.

304 So.2d 895 (1974)

Linda WILLIAMS v. ALABAMA NEON SIGN CO. et al.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 5, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams, Williams & Williams, P.C., Tuscaloosa, Carl E. Chamblee, Birmingham, for appellant.

Dunn, Porterfield, McDowell, Scholl & Clark, Birmingham, for appellees Ala. Neon Sign Co. and E. L. Fesperman individually and d/b/a Ala. Neon Sign Co.

Balch, Bingham, Baker, Hawthorne, Williams & Ward and Thomas W. Christian and John P. Scott, Jr., Birmingham, for appellee Ala. Power Co.

London, Yancey, Clark & Allen and John M. Laney, Jr., Birmingham, for appellee Armco Steel Corp.

Edward O. Conerly, Birmingham, for appellees St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Jack L. Hail, John L. Sullivan, John B. Warren, John Beale and Ala. Outdoor Advertising Co.

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether a wife may maintain an action for loss of her husband's consortium in Alabama.

The trial court, following Smith v. United Construction Workers, District 50, 271 Ala. 42, 122 So.2d 153, dismissed the action on the ground that the wife had no cause of action. This court overruled Smith, supra, in Swartz v. United States Steel Corporation, 293 Ala. 439...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases